Fix incorrect test for sortedLastIndex snippet
This commit is contained in:
@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Use `Array.reverse()` and `Array.findIndex()` to find the appropriate last index
|
|||||||
const sortedLastIndex = (arr, n) => {
|
const sortedLastIndex = (arr, n) => {
|
||||||
const isDescending = arr[0] > arr[arr.length - 1];
|
const isDescending = arr[0] > arr[arr.length - 1];
|
||||||
const index = arr.reverse().findIndex(el => (isDescending ? n <= el : n >= el));
|
const index = arr.reverse().findIndex(el => (isDescending ? n <= el : n >= el));
|
||||||
return index === -1 ? 0 : arr.length - index - 1;
|
return index === -1 ? 0 : arr.length - index;
|
||||||
};
|
};
|
||||||
```
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|||||||
const sortedLastIndex = (arr, n) => {
|
const sortedLastIndex = (arr, n) => {
|
||||||
const isDescending = arr[0] > arr[arr.length - 1];
|
const isDescending = arr[0] > arr[arr.length - 1];
|
||||||
const index = arr.reverse().findIndex(el => (isDescending ? n <= el : n >= el));
|
const index = arr.reverse().findIndex(el => (isDescending ? n <= el : n >= el));
|
||||||
return index === -1 ? 0 : arr.length - index - 1;
|
return index === -1 ? 0 : arr.length - index;
|
||||||
};
|
};
|
||||||
module.exports = sortedLastIndex;
|
module.exports = sortedLastIndex;
|
||||||
@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ test('Testing sortedLastIndex', (t) => {
|
|||||||
//For more information on all the methods supported by tape
|
//For more information on all the methods supported by tape
|
||||||
//Please go to https://github.com/substack/tape
|
//Please go to https://github.com/substack/tape
|
||||||
t.true(typeof sortedLastIndex === 'function', 'sortedLastIndex is a Function');
|
t.true(typeof sortedLastIndex === 'function', 'sortedLastIndex is a Function');
|
||||||
t.equal(sortedLastIndex([10, 20, 30, 30, 40], 30), 3, 'Returns the highest index to insert the element without messing up the list order');
|
t.equal(sortedLastIndex([10, 20, 30, 30, 40], 30), 4, 'Returns the highest index to insert the element without messing up the list order');
|
||||||
//t.deepEqual(sortedLastIndex(args..), 'Expected');
|
//t.deepEqual(sortedLastIndex(args..), 'Expected');
|
||||||
//t.equal(sortedLastIndex(args..), 'Expected');
|
//t.equal(sortedLastIndex(args..), 'Expected');
|
||||||
//t.false(sortedLastIndex(args..), 'Expected');
|
//t.false(sortedLastIndex(args..), 'Expected');
|
||||||
//t.throws(sortedLastIndex(args..), 'Expected');
|
//t.throws(sortedLastIndex(args..), 'Expected');
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user